Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cub Law"

From Scouts Canada Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Does this need to be a page separate from [[Cub Scouts]]? Perhaps add either history to to the main Cubs page or more context for why/how it was changed to this page to make it less of a stub.--[[User:Cat|Cat]] 00:34, 15 June 2011 (EDT)
 
Does this need to be a page separate from [[Cub Scouts]]? Perhaps add either history to to the main Cubs page or more context for why/how it was changed to this page to make it less of a stub.--[[User:Cat|Cat]] 00:34, 15 June 2011 (EDT)
  
Hey Cat, I debated this. And decided to keep it separate for the moment. 1: to keep from overloading people with information on the main page (especially new scouters new to wikis), and 2: the page needs much better organization. I am working on the second (especially infoboxes). Once we have that - and a fairly universal standard - we can merge the pages. Does that make sense?--[[User:Trevpage|Trevpage]] 11:36, 15 June 2011 (EDT)
+
:Hey Cat, I debated this. And decided to keep it separate for the moment. 1: to keep from overloading people with information on the main page (especially new scouters new to wikis), and 2: the page needs much better organization. I am working on the second (especially infoboxes). Once we have that - and a fairly universal standard - we can merge the pages. Does that make sense?--[[User:Trevpage|Trevpage]] 11:36, 15 June 2011 (EDT)
 +
:: Sounds good. It could still use a category and links to other pages though. Right now it's sort of sitting off by itself :) --[[User:Cat|Cat]] 12:49, 15 June 2011 (EDT)
 +
:::True enough. I'll leave the category up to you! =P One thing at a time. I'm going to use the excuse of being a "big picture" guy! =D Once we've got infoboxes I'll get going hard (assuming I have access to the internet). --[[User:Trevpage|Trevpage]] 22:06, 15 June 2011 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 21:06, 15 June 2011

Does this need to be a page separate from Cub Scouts? Perhaps add either history to to the main Cubs page or more context for why/how it was changed to this page to make it less of a stub.--Cat 00:34, 15 June 2011 (EDT)

Hey Cat, I debated this. And decided to keep it separate for the moment. 1: to keep from overloading people with information on the main page (especially new scouters new to wikis), and 2: the page needs much better organization. I am working on the second (especially infoboxes). Once we have that - and a fairly universal standard - we can merge the pages. Does that make sense?--Trevpage 11:36, 15 June 2011 (EDT)
Sounds good. It could still use a category and links to other pages though. Right now it's sort of sitting off by itself :) --Cat 12:49, 15 June 2011 (EDT)
True enough. I'll leave the category up to you! =P One thing at a time. I'm going to use the excuse of being a "big picture" guy! =D Once we've got infoboxes I'll get going hard (assuming I have access to the internet). --Trevpage 22:06, 15 June 2011 (EDT)