Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
Alexkillby (Talk | contribs) (Created page with " == Navigation == I'm just wondering if there will be some sort of navigation structure, at the moment it seems pretty search-based however I'm thinking with initially limited co...") |
Alexkillby (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
== Navigation == | == Navigation == | ||
I'm just wondering if there will be some sort of navigation structure, at the moment it seems pretty search-based however I'm thinking with initially limited content, or even first time users, it may be more useful to create a navigation page of some sort that helps users explore the content that exists! | I'm just wondering if there will be some sort of navigation structure, at the moment it seems pretty search-based however I'm thinking with initially limited content, or even first time users, it may be more useful to create a navigation page of some sort that helps users explore the content that exists! | ||
--[[User:Alexkillby|Alexkillby]] 13:24, 3 March 2011 (EST) | --[[User:Alexkillby|Alexkillby]] 13:24, 3 March 2011 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Local Storage Limited == | ||
| + | I really don't think we should mention that "local storage is limited". Messages like these only discourage use of this potentially giant tool for our leadership across the country. I would hope that if uptake of the use of this resource was big enough to actually stress out the servers it is hosted on, that we'd invest more into a system that could sustain the amount of use is receiving. Let me know if there are any objections or I will remove this. | ||
Revision as of 14:40, 3 March 2011
I'm just wondering if there will be some sort of navigation structure, at the moment it seems pretty search-based however I'm thinking with initially limited content, or even first time users, it may be more useful to create a navigation page of some sort that helps users explore the content that exists! --Alexkillby 13:24, 3 March 2011 (EST)
Local Storage Limited
I really don't think we should mention that "local storage is limited". Messages like these only discourage use of this potentially giant tool for our leadership across the country. I would hope that if uptake of the use of this resource was big enough to actually stress out the servers it is hosted on, that we'd invest more into a system that could sustain the amount of use is receiving. Let me know if there are any objections or I will remove this.
